Introduktion
The United States of America is home to the majority of undocumented citizens, numbering almost 11 million individuals.

Among the programs aimed at assisting these immigrants is the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Program, which was created during Barack Obama's presidency.

DACA serves as a safeguard against deportation for immigrants under the age of 16. The program gained rapid popularity, instilling trust and hope in many.

However, when Donald Trump assumed power, he abolished DACA, leaving immigrants without the safety and protection they had come to rely on.

This pressing issue is brought to light by the journalist and filmmaker Jose Antonio Vargas in his article titled "Dreamers Put Their Trust in DACA. What Now?" published in The New York Times on September 9, 2017.

Utdrag
The article, published in The New York Times, touches upon various subjects. Foremost among them is the shutdown of the DACA program, but it also delves into the broader issue of illegal immigrants and the author's own experiences as an undocumented immigrant.

The tone of the narrative is laden with sadness and emotion, a result of the author's choice of words and composition.

To effectively connect with the reader, the author employs pathos as his primary tool. By inviting readers into his personal life and evoking their emotions, he crafts a compelling narrative: "The first adult I ever told I was here illegally was Mrs. Denny, my high school choir teacher.

It's a story I've told many times, and written about too, because the moment meant so much to me." This approach resonates deeply with readers' emotions.

Furthermore, the author employs logos to persuade his audience by presenting logical arguments and factual information. He weaves these facts into his personal story, giving substance to his case.

For example, he raises questions about the trustworthiness of Congress, especially in light of historical instances where both Democrats and Republicans have used so-called Dreamers, named after the long-stalled Dream Act, as bargaining chips.

This strategic use of logos encourages readers to critically evaluate the authority of Congress, a pivotal element in the text.